Terminated with Cause

My employer has terminated me “with cause” or with “just cause”. What does that mean?

The employer has taken the position that you have engaged in conduct that warrants termination without any notice or pay in lieu (i.e. no severance package). The employer is saying that the employment relationship has been permanently damaged and no other form of discipline was appropriate in the circumstances.

Did my employer have just cause to terminate me?

Unless the conduct is especially serious or happened on previous occasions (for which you had been warned), it can be very difficult for an employer to establish just cause.

In determining whether just cause exists, each case must be examined objectively and on its own facts. Decisions in other cases, therefore, may have little value.

Grounds for just cause may include:

• insubordination
• conflict of interest
• gross incompetence
• habitual neglect of duty
• unauthorized absence
• theft and fraud
• dishonesty
• lying to employer during investigation
• breach of employer’s policy
• assaulting co-workers

However, the test is whether the employee’s misconduct gave rise to an irreparable breakdown in the employment relationship. Just cause for dismissal will exist where the misconduct violates an essential condition of the employment contract, breaches the faith inherent to the work relationship, or is fundamentally or directly inconsistent with the employee’s obligations to their employer.

Is there anything that can help me if I have been terminated with cause?

Yes. Because determining whether you were properly terminated with cause depends on a contextual approach, the following factors may help your case:

• A “just cause” dismissal is the “capital punishment” of employment law and, as a result, the onus is on the employer to show misconduct of the most serious kind.

• A single instance of misconduct is often not enough to warrant dismissal for cause.

• Dismissal for cause for performance-related issues generally requires that the employer have given the employee a warning and a reasonable opportunity to correct the deficiency before dismissal.

• If an employer does not act promptly in dismissing an employee (for misconduct the employer knows about), the employer is said to have condoned the behaviour. The employer will not be able rely on that behaviour to summarily dismiss the employee in the future.

• The longer an employee has been with the employer, the harder it is for the employer to justify dismissing them for cause.

• Where an employer does not stick to its own disciplinary policies (either in the handling of your matter or with other incidents involving other employees) it is often fatal to the employer’s case.

• A faulty investigation (i.e. no fair opportunity for you to tell your side of the story) can ruin an employer’s case.

Important: These are just a few of the things that can help your case.

Can my employer terminate me without cause and then later say that it had cause?

If an employer terminates you without cause and then later becomes aware of misconduct (that it was not aware of at the time of your termination), it can rely on the newly discovered misconduct – and claim that it had cause to fire you. This is called after acquired cause.

Unfortunately, after acquired cause allegations are sometimes raised by the employer in order to deter a former employee from pursuing their legal entitlements. These allegations may arise after the employee confronts the employer about an inadequate severance offer.

Important: Judges will pay extra attention to an employer who alleges cause after the fact. Further, a failed after acquired cause argument may attract a higher notice period for an employee.

I have been terminated “with cause”. Am I entitled to anything under the Employment Standards Act, 2000?

Under the Employment Standards Act, 2000, there are some exceptions to an employer’s obligation to provide notice. One of those is where the employee is guilty of “wilful misconduct, disobedience or wilful neglect of duty that is not trivial and has not been condoned by the employer”.

This is similar to the concept of “just cause” at common law which would disentitle the employee to reasonable notice. At common law, “just cause” for dismissal can be found for various forms of misconduct, including misconduct that is less than “wilful”. Therefore, the standard under the Employment Standards Act has been interpreted as being a higher standard than the “just cause” standard employed under the common law.

What does all of this mean? It means that, even if you were dismissed with cause by your employer, you may still be entitled to compensation under the Employment Standards Act.

Caution: It is not recommended that you make a complaint under the Employment Standards Act until you consult with a lawyer. If you make an Employment Standards complaint with the Ministry of Labour (with respect to your entitlements upon termination) you will be barred from pursuing a wrongful dismissal claim unless your complaint is withdrawn within two weeks. Further, with some limited exceptions, the maximum you can obtain through such a complaint is $10,000.

I have been terminated with cause. Am I entitled to Employment Insurance benefits?

If you were terminated for cause, your entitlement to Employment Insurance benefits is determined by the Employment Insurance Act, and the discretion of an employment insurance officer, board, or umpire.

The Employment Insurance Act uses the standard of “misconduct”. Precisely what type of “misconduct” would disqualify an employee from receiving benefits is not clear, but many employees who are terminated by their employers for just cause are still eligible for Employment Insurance benefits.

In my view, this is probably due to the fact that many employers do not tend to respond to questions asked by employment insurance officers. First, there is no legal obligation to do so. Second, an employer has no economic interest in whether the employee receives Employment Insurance benefits.

The Employment Insurance Act basically states that in the absence of any evidence from the employer, they are to give the benefit of the doubt to the employee.

I’m worried about what my employer might say to prospective employers.

It is possible that your former employer might say something negative about you, but many employers do not want to risk further potential liability. In addition, it is usually in the employer’s interests that you find work as quickly as possible – so that any potential damages are reduced.

Important: Having said this, there are other potential solutions to this dilemma. It is important to speak with an employment lawyer about this.

Visit our videos page or download a free guide to learn more about severance pay.

After 17 years of loyal service, my employer terminated me for cause for breach of a policy. David proved that the policy didn’t even exist, and that the employer simply wanted to avoid paying me severance. I would have gone bankrupt without Ertl Lawyers.

 

– B.P., Maintenance Supervisor, Oakville

Have you been terminated?

Get the severance pay you deserve.

If you were terminated without cause, you can call us for a free consultation.

We will tell you whether your severance package is fair or not, whether you are entitled to more, how much you might be entitled to, and answer any other questions you may have. 

Our help can make all the difference!

Related Blogs

Your Guide to Record of Employment in Ontario

Your Guide to Record of Employment in Ontario

If you’ve never had a Record of Employment (ROE) issued to you, you might confuse it for a T4 slip the first time you see it. While it looks like a simple, straightforward document containing standard information like your name, address and those of your former...

read more
Workplace Sexual Harassment Laws in Canada

Workplace Sexual Harassment Laws in Canada

One in four women and 17% of men experienced sexual misconduct while in the workplace in Canada in 2020. Realistically, those numbers are probably higher. Employers are legally required to provide a safe, harassment-free workplace. Nobody should have to endure sexual...

read more
What is Sick Leave in Ontario & How Does it Work?

What is Sick Leave in Ontario & How Does it Work?

The term "sick leave" is used by most people to refer to any time taken off work when someone is too sick or has an injury and has to stay home. But sick leave actually refers to a specific type of leave that is spelled out in either an employment contract or federal...

read more

Related Videos

Severance Pay Calculator

October 26, 2020 | Employment

How to Handle Negative Performance Reviews

October 26, 2020 | Employment

5 Reasons Your PIP is a Sham

October 26, 2020 | Employment

Copy link
Powered by Social Snap